Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on February 18, 2008
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008 129(1-3):87-90; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
129/1-3/87    most recent
ncn034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernardi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Padovani, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernardi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Padovani, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Quality criteria for cardiac images: an update

G. Bernardi1,*, O. Bar2, T. Jezewski3, E. Vano4, C. Maccia5, A. Trianni6 and R. Padovani6

1 Cardiology Department, Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Udine, Italy
2 Clinique Saint Gatien, Tours, France
3 II Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
4 Medical Physics Department, San Carlos Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
5 Centre d'Assurance de qualité des Applications Technologiques dans le domaine de la Santé (CAATS), Paris, France
6 Medical Physics Department, Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Udine, Italy

* Corresponding author: bernardi.guglielmo{at}aoud.sanita.fvg.it

The DIMOND II and III Cardiology Groups have agreed on quality criteria for cardiac images and developed a scoring system, to provide a tool to test quality of coronary angiograms, which was demonstrated to be of value in clinical practice. In the last years, digital flat panel technology has been introduced in cardiac angiographic systems and the radiological technique may have been influenced by the better performance of these new detectors. This advance in digital imaging, together with the lesson learned from previous studies, warranted the revision of the quality criteria for cardiac angiographic images as formerly defined. DIMOND criteria were reassessed to allow a simpler evaluation of angiograms. Clinical criteria were simplified and separated from technical criteria. Furthermore, the characteristics of an optimised angiographic technique have been outlined.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.