Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on July 24, 2007
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007 127(1-4):158-162; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm364
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
127/1-4/158    most recent
ncm364v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Chettle, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Chettle, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Monte Carlo simulation of trabecular bone remodelling and absorbed dose coefficients for tritium and 14C

R. B. Richardson1,*, H. L. Nie2 and D. R. Chettle3

1 Radiation Biology and Health Physics Branch, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada K0J 1J0
2 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3 Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1

* Corresponding author: richardr{at}aecl.ca

A Monte Carlo simulation of multiple trabecular bone cavities in adult bone was developed and the absorbed radiation dose factors evaluated for 3H and 14C. The model was developed to assess the dose from radionuclide uptake in quiescent bone, but also the effects of temporal changes in bone turnover by incorporating bone-modelling units (BMU). Absorbed dose fractions were calculated for target regions that include the endosteal layer where radiation-sensitive stem cells in bone marrow are considered to reside preferentially. There were large differences in the absorbed fractions for two types of bone surface, quiescent and forming. Tritium in quiescent bone results in a dose to the endosteum about 20 times that for the same activity in forming bone surface irradiating osteoblasts. When the quiescent bone surface source was extended from an infinitely thin layer to a more realistic 1 µm thick, the tritium absorbed fractions for endosteum and red marrow targets fell by more than 2-fold.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.