Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007 125(1-4):61-68; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm325
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cruz Suárez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mrabit, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cruz Suárez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mrabit, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Intercomparison on Measurements of the Quantity Personal Dose Equivalent Hp(d) in Mixed (Neutron-Gamma) Fields—an IAEA Project

R. Cruz Suárez1,*, H. Schuhmacher2, J. L. Pochat3, Andreas Zimbal2 and K. Mrabit1

1 Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety, International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse 5, POB 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
2 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Bundesallee 100, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
3 Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire Cadarache BP3, F-13115 St. Paul-lez-durance, France

*Corresponding author: r.cruz-suarez{at}iaea.org

Within its occupational radiation protection programme, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) initiated and funded an international intercomparison exercise of personal dosemeters to determine the quantity personal dose equivalent in mixed neutron-photon radiation. The objectives of the intercomparison are to assess the capabilities of the dosimetry services in measuring the quantity Hp(10) in mixed neutron-gamma fields; to assist IAEA member states in achieving sufficiently accurate dosimetry; and, if necessary, to provide guidelines for improvements (not simply a test of the performance of the existing dosimetry service). The intercomparison is directed to passive dosemeters to determine, in mixed neutron-gamma radiation fields, either these two components separately or the total personal dose equivalent. The intercomparison consists of two phases:

Phase I—Type-test intercomparison: irradiation in selected calibration fields and results used to improve dosimetric procedures of participating laboratories, where needed.

Phase II—Simulated workplace field intercomparison: irradiation in radiation fields similar to those in workplaces as a final check of performance.

The exercise revealed clear deficiencies in the methodology used by several laboratories and necessitated a detailed analysis of the existing discrepancies. This papers summaries the finding and conclusions for radiation fields similar to those found in nuclear industry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.