Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on October 13, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007 125(1-4):19-22; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl132
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
125/1-4/19    most recent
ncl132v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doerfel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zeger, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doerfel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zeger, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

General guidelines for the assessment of internal dose from monitoring data: progress of the IDEAS project

H. Doerfel1,*, A. Andrasi2, M. Bailey3, E. Blanchardon4, R. Cruz-Suarez5, V. Berkovski6, C.-M. Castellani7, C. Hurtgen8, B. LeGuen9, I. Malatova10, J. Marsh3, J. Stather3 and J. Zeger5

1 Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Karlsruhe Germany
2 KFKI Atomic Energy Research Institute, Budapest Hungary
3 Radiation Protection Division, Health Protection Agency Chilton, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK
4 Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses France
5 International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna Austria
6 Radiation Protection Institute, Kiev Ukraine
7 ENEA Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna Italy
8 Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol Belgium
9 Electricite de France, Saint-Denis France
10 NRPI Prague, Czech Republic

*Corresponding author: info{at}idea-system.com

In recent major international intercomparison exercises on intake and internal dose assessments from monitoring data, the results calculated by different participants varied significantly. Based on this experience the need for harmonisation of the procedures has been formulated within an EU 5th Framework Programme research project. The aim of the project, IDEAS, is to develop general guidelines for standardising assessments of intakes and internal doses. The IDEAS project started in October 2001 and ended in June 2005. The project is closely related to some goals of the work of Committee 2 of the ICRP and since 2003 there has been close cooperation between the two groups. To ensure that the guidelines are applicable to a wide range of practical situations, the first step was to compile a database of well-documented cases of internal contamination. In parallel, an improved version of an existing software package was developed and distributed to the partners for further use. A large number of cases from the database was evaluated independently by the partners and the results reviewed. Based on these evaluations, guidelines were drafted and discussed with dosimetry professionals from around the world by means of a virtual workshop on the Internet early in 2004. The guidelines have been revised and refined on the basis of the experiences and discussions in this virtual workshop. The general philosophy of the Guidelines is presented here, focusing on the principles of harmonisation, optimisation and proportionality. Finally, the proposed Levels of Task to structure the approach of internal dose evaluation are reported.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.