Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on April 22, 2007
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007 125(1-4):113-116; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm195
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
125/1-4/113    most recent
ncm195v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, A.
Right arrow Articles by Alfassi, Z. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, A.
Right arrow Articles by Alfassi, Z. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

On the reassessment of doses in TL-dosimetry by measuring the residual dose

A. Abraham1,*, M. Weinstein1, U. German1 and Z. B. Alfassi2

1 Nuclear Research Center Negev P.O.B 9001, 84190 Beer Sheva, Israel
2 Ben-Gurion University of the Negev 84105 Beer Sheva, Israel

*Corresponding author: adlioh{at}bezeqint.net

Second readouts and the photo-transferred thermoluminscence (PTTL) method are sometimes used to reassess high doses. When using the common LiF:Mg,Ti, if the second readout is performed by a regular readout cycle of 13.3 s, its efficiency is low and the estimations cannot be obtained with acceptable accuracy for low doses in the 10–100 mSv range. By applying the PTTL method, the efficiency is much higher, but a high background is also present, deteriorating the quality of the reassessment. A simple and efficient method was studied, which consists of expanding the heating time to 30 s. Although the efficiency relative to a standard readout is improved by only a factor of 3, the low background enables to obtain results with the same uncertainty as the more complicated PTTL method. By applying region of integration discrimination, the errors can be further diminished.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.