Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on May 12, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006 121(4):399-405; doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl055
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
121/4/399    most recent
ncl055v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merdanoglu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Altinsoy, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merdanoglu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Altinsoy, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples from Kestanbol granite area, Turkey

B. Merdanoglu and N. Altinsoy*

Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Institute of Energy, Ayazaga Kampusu, 34469-Istanbul, Turkey

* Corresponding author: altinsoy{at}itu.edu.tr

Received September 27, 2005, amended April 5, 2006, accepted April 9, 2006


   Abstract

The concentrations and distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in soils from around the Kestanbol (Çanakkale), Turkey were investigated with an aim of evaluating the environmental radioactivity and radiological health hazard. Concentrations of radionuclides in the samples were determined by gamma ray spectrometer using HPGe detector. In the soils in general, the concentration of 232Th was found to be higher than that of the 238U and the activities of 232Th and 238U in this area are higher than the world average. 137Cs was observed in all the samples, ranging from 0.37 ± 0.22 to 36.03 ± 0.54 Bq kg–1. The mean radium equivalent activity, external hazard index and terrestrial absorbed dose rate for the area under study are 498 Bq kg–1, 1.4 and 219 nGy h–1, respectively. The annual effective dose to the public was found to be 269 µSv. The present data were compared with data obtained from diffrent countries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. K. Ademola, O. S. Hammed, and C. A. Adejumobi
Radioactivity and dose assessment of marble samples from Igbeti mines, Nigeria
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(1): 94 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
Y. Orgun, N. Altinsoy, S. Y. Sahin, B. Ataksor, and N. Celebi
A study of indoor radon levels in rural dwellings of Ezine (Canakkale, Turkey) using solid-state nuclear track detectors
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2008; 131(3): 379 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
O. Kilic, M. Belivermis, S. Topcuoglu, Y. Cotuk, M. Coskun, A. Cayir, and R. Kucer
Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment in surface soil samples from east and south of Marmara region, Turkey
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 1, 2008; 128(3): 324 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.