Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 116(1-4):585-591; doi:10.1093/rpd/nci082
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Titarenko, Yu. E.
Right arrow Articles by Prael, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Titarenko, Yu. E.
Right arrow Articles by Prael, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Theoretical simulation of residual nuclide products in 208,207,206Pb, NATPb and 209Bi (P,X) reactions at intermediate and high energies

Yu. E. Titarenko1,*, V. F. Batyaev1, V. M. Zhivun1, R. D. Mulambetov1, S. V. Mulambetova1, S. L. Zaitsev1, K. A. Lipatov1, V. S. Barashenkov2, S. G. Mashnik3 and R. E. Prael3

1 Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP), B.Cheremushkinskaya 25, 117259 Moscow, Russia
2 JINR, Dubna, Russia
3 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA

* Corresponding author: Yury.Titarenko{at}itep.ru

The independent and cumulative measured yields of residual products in thin lead and bismuth targets irradiated with 0.04–2.6 GeV protons are compared with results by the LAHET, CEM03, LAQGSM03, INCL+ABLA, CASCADE and YIELDX codes, in order to evaluate the predictive power of the codes in this energy region. We found that the predictive power of the tested codes is different but is satisfactory for most of the nuclides in the spallation region, though none of the codes agree well with the data in the whole-mass region of product nuclides and all should be improved further. On the whole, the predictive power of all codes for the data in the fission and fragmentation product regions and, especially, at the borders between spallation and fission and between fission and fragmentation regions is much worse than in the spallation region; therefore, development of better evaporation/fission/fragmentation models is of first priority.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.