Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 114(1-3):97-101; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch525
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Håkansson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Månsson, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Håkansson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Månsson, L. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise

Markus Håkansson1,*, Magnus Båth1, Sara Börjesson1, Susanne Kheddache2, Åse Allansdotter Johnsson2 and Lars Gunnar Månsson1

1 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
2 Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden

* Corresponding author: markus.hakansson{at}vgregion.se

Apart from the image content that is the reproduction of anatomy and possible lesions, an X-ray image also contains system noise due to the limited number of photons and other internal noise sources in the system (image plate artefacts, electronic noise, etc.). The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which the system noise influences the detection of subtle lung nodules in five different regions of the chest. This was done by conducting a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study with five observers on two different sets of images; clinical chest X-ray images and images of a LucAl phantom at similar dose levels found in the different regions of the chest. In both image types, mathematically simulated nodules (with a full-width-at-fifth-maximum of 10 mm) were added to the images at varying contrast levels. As a measure of the influence of system noise on the detection of subtle lung nodules, the ratio between the contrast needed to obtain an area under the ROC curve of 0.80 in the system noise images to that needed in the clinical images was used. The contrast ratio between system noise images and clinical images ranged from ~0.02 (in the hilar region) to 0.18 (in the lower mediastinal region). The maximum difference in contrast needed for the corresponding system noise images, collected at the lowest and the highest dose represented in the anatomical image, was a factor of 2. These results indicate that probably no region in a chest X-ray image is limited by the number of quanta to the detector for the detection of 10 mm lung nodules when a radiation dose corresponding to a system with speed class 200 (leading to a detector dose of ~9 µGy behind the parenchyma) is used.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Vikgren, S. Zachrisson, A. Svalkvist, A. A. Johnsson, M. Boijsen, A. Flinck, S. Kheddache, and M. Bath
Comparison of Chest Tomosynthesis and Chest Radiography for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: Human Observer Study of Clinical Cases
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 1034 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
S. Borjesson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Kheddache, S. Svensson, A. Tingberg, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, B. Hemdal, S. Mattsson, et al.
A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, A. Tingberg, S. Mattsson, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 85 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Flinck, G. Ullman, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 92 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, F. O. Bochud, F. R. Verdun, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, C. Hoeschen, O. Tischenko, S. Kheddache, J. Vikgren, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, J. Hansson, and L. G. Mansson
A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 230 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. Hansson, M. Bath, M. Hakansson, H. Grundin, E. Bjurklint, P. Orvestad, A. Kjellstrom, H. Bostrom, M. Jonsson, K. Jonsson, et al.
An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 278 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
L. G. Mansson, M. Bath, and S. Mattsson
Priorities in optimisation of medical X-ray imaging--a contribution to the debate
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 298 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.