Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise
1 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
2 Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
* Corresponding author: markus.hakansson{at}vgregion.se
Apart from the image content that is the reproduction of anatomy and possible lesions, an X-ray image also contains system noise due to the limited number of photons and other internal noise sources in the system (image plate artefacts, electronic noise, etc.). The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which the system noise influences the detection of subtle lung nodules in five different regions of the chest. This was done by conducting a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study with five observers on two different sets of images; clinical chest X-ray images and images of a LucAl phantom at similar dose levels found in the different regions of the chest. In both image types, mathematically simulated nodules (with a full-width-at-fifth-maximum of 10 mm) were added to the images at varying contrast levels. As a measure of the influence of system noise on the detection of subtle lung nodules, the ratio between the contrast needed to obtain an area under the ROC curve of 0.80 in the system noise images to that needed in the clinical images was used. The contrast ratio between system noise images and clinical images ranged from
0.02 (in the hilar region) to 0.18 (in the lower mediastinal region). The maximum difference in contrast needed for the corresponding system noise images, collected at the lowest and the highest dose represented in the anatomical image, was a factor of 2. These results indicate that probably no region in a chest X-ray image is limited by the number of quanta to the detector for the detection of 10 mm lung nodules when a radiation dose corresponding to a system with speed class 200 (leading to a detector dose of
9 µGy behind the parenchyma) is used.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Vikgren, S. Zachrisson, A. Svalkvist, A. A. Johnsson, M. Boijsen, A. Flinck, S. Kheddache, and M. Bath Comparison of Chest Tomosynthesis and Chest Radiography for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: Human Observer Study of Clinical Cases Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 1034 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Borjesson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Kheddache, S. Svensson, A. Tingberg, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, B. Hemdal, S. Mattsson, et al. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, A. Tingberg, S. Mattsson, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 85 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Flinck, G. Ullman, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 92 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, F. O. Bochud, F. R. Verdun, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 102 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, C. Hoeschen, O. Tischenko, S. Kheddache, J. Vikgren, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 109 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, J. Hansson, and L. G. Mansson A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 230 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hansson, M. Bath, M. Hakansson, H. Grundin, E. Bjurklint, P. Orvestad, A. Kjellstrom, H. Bostrom, M. Jonsson, K. Jonsson, et al. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 278 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Mansson, M. Bath, and S. Mattsson Priorities in optimisation of medical X-ray imaging--a contribution to the debate Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 298 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

