Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location
1 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
2 Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
3 Department of Radiation Physics, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
* Corresponding author: markus.hakansson{at}vgregion.se
Most detection studies in chest radiography treat the entire chest image as a single background or divided into the two regions parenchyma and mediastinum. However, the different parts of the lung show great variations in attenuation and structure, leading to different amounts of quantum noise and scattered radiation as well as different complexity. Detailed data on the difference in detectability in the different regions are of importance. The purpose of this study was to quantify the difference in detectability between different regions of a chest image. The chest X ray was divided into six different regions, where each region was considered to be uniform in terms of detectability. Thirty clinical chest images were collected and divided into the different regions. Simulated designer nodules with a full-width-at-fifth-maximum of 10 mm but with varying contrast were added to the images. An equal number of images lacking pathology were included and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was conducted with five observers. Results show that the image contrast needed to obtain a constant value of Az (area under an ROC curve) differs by more than a factor of four between different regions.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Vikgren, S. Zachrisson, A. Svalkvist, A. A. Johnsson, M. Boijsen, A. Flinck, S. Kheddache, and M. Bath Comparison of Chest Tomosynthesis and Chest Radiography for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: Human Observer Study of Clinical Cases Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 1034 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D S Brettle, E Berry, and M A Smith The effect of experience on detectability in local area anatomical noise Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 186 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Borjesson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Kheddache, S. Svensson, A. Tingberg, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, B. Hemdal, S. Mattsson, et al. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, A. Tingberg, S. Mattsson, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 85 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. A. Johnsson, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 97 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, S. Kheddache, A. Grahn, F. O. Bochud, F. R. Verdun, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 102 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, C. Hoeschen, O. Tischenko, S. Kheddache, J. Vikgren, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 109 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|