Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 114(1-3):81-84; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch517
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tischenko, O.
Right arrow Articles by Bakic, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tischenko, O.
Right arrow Articles by Bakic, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms

Oleg Tischenko1,2, Christoph Hoeschen1,2,*, David R. Dance3, Roger A. Hunt3, Andrew D. A. Maidment4 and Predrag R. Bakic4

1 Department for Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
2 GSF–National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, Working Group Medical Physics, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
3 Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London, London SW3 6JJ, UK
4 Department of Radiology, The Thomas Jefferson University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

* Corresponding author: Christoph.Hoeschen{at}gsf.de

A novel method of noise reduction has been tested for mammography using computer-simulated images for which the truth is known exactly. This method is based on comparing two images. The images are compared at different scales, using a cross-correlation function as a measure of similarity to define the image modifications in the wavelet domain. The computer-simulated images were calculated for noise-free primary radiation using a quasi-realistic voxel phantom. Two images corresponding to slightly different geometry were produced. Gaussian noise was added with certain properties to simulate quantum noise. The added noise could be reduced by >70% using the proposed method without any noticeable corruption of the structures. It is possible to save 50% dose in mammography by producing two images (each 25% of the dose for a standard mammogram). Additionally, a reduction of the anatomical noise and, therefore, better detection rates of breast cancer in mammography are possible.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
O. Tischenko, C. Hoeschen, and E. Buhr
Reduction of anatomical noise in medical X-ray images
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 69 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, C. Hoeschen, O. Tischenko, S. Kheddache, J. Vikgren, and L. G. Mansson
Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. Hoeschen, U. Fill, M. Zankl, W. Panzer, D. Regulla, and W. Dohring
A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 406 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.