Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms
1 Department for Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
2 GSFNational Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, Working Group Medical Physics, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
3 Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London, London SW3 6JJ, UK
4 Department of Radiology, The Thomas Jefferson University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
* Corresponding author: Christoph.Hoeschen{at}gsf.de
A novel method of noise reduction has been tested for mammography using computer-simulated images for which the truth is known exactly. This method is based on comparing two images. The images are compared at different scales, using a cross-correlation function as a measure of similarity to define the image modifications in the wavelet domain. The computer-simulated images were calculated for noise-free primary radiation using a quasi-realistic voxel phantom. Two images corresponding to slightly different geometry were produced. Gaussian noise was added with certain properties to simulate quantum noise. The added noise could be reduced by >70% using the proposed method without any noticeable corruption of the structures. It is possible to save 50% dose in mammography by producing two images (each 25% of the dose for a standard mammogram). Additionally, a reduction of the anatomical noise and, therefore, better detection rates of breast cancer in mammography are possible.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Tischenko, C. Hoeschen, and E. Buhr Reduction of anatomical noise in medical X-ray images Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 69 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, S. Borjesson, C. Hoeschen, O. Tischenko, S. Kheddache, J. Vikgren, and L. G. Mansson Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 109 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hoeschen, U. Fill, M. Zankl, W. Panzer, D. Regulla, and W. Dohring A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 406 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
