Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005 114(1-3):62-68; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch527
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tingberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Månsson, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tingberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Månsson, L. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs

Anders Tingberg1,*, Fredrik Eriksson1, Joakim Medin1, Jack Besjakov2, Magnus Båth3, Markus Håkansson3, Michael Sandborg4, Anja Almén1, Birgitta Lanhede3, Gudrun Alm-Carlsson4, Sören Mattsson1 and Lars Gunnar Månsson3

1 Department of Radiation Physics, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
2 Department of Radiology, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
3 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
4 Department of Radiation Physics, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden

* Corresponding author: anders.tingberg{at}rfa.mas.lu.se

Purpose: To investigate the influence of masking on the inter-observer variation in image quality evaluation of clinical radiographs of chest and lumbar spine. Background: Inter-observer variation is a big problem in image quality evaluation since this variation is often much bigger than the variation in image quality between, for example, two radiographic systems. In this study, we have evaluated the effect of masking on the inter-observer variation. The idea of the masking was to force every observer to view exactly the same part of the image and to avoid the effect of the overall ‘first impression’ of the image. A discussion with a group of European expert radiologists before the study indicated that masking might be a good way to reduce the inter-observer variation. Methods: Five chest and five lumbar spine radiographs were collected together with detailed information regarding exposure conditions. The radiographs were digitised with a high-performance scanner and five different manipulations were performed, simulating five different exposure conditions. The contrast, noise and spatial resolution were manipulated by this method. The images were printed onto the film and the individual masks were produced for each film, showing only the parts of the images that were necessary for the image quality evaluation. The quality of the images was evaluated on ordinary viewing boxes by a large group of experienced radiologists. The images were examined with and without the masks with a set of image criteria (if fulfilled, 1 point; and not fulfilled, 0 point), and the mean score was calculated for each simulated exposure condition. Results: The results of this study indicate that—contrary to what was supposed—the inter-observer variation increased when the images were masked. In some cases, especially for chest, this increase was statistically significant. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, image masking in studies of fulfilment of image criteria cannot be recommended.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
F Yasar, S Sener, E Yesilova, and F Akgunlu
Mandibular cortical index evaluation in masked and unmasked panoramic radiographs
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2009; 38(2): 86 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
S. Borjesson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Kheddache, S. Svensson, A. Tingberg, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, B. Hemdal, S. Mattsson, et al.
A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.