Evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine images: a comparison between FFE and VGA
1 Department of Radiation Physics, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
2 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
4 Department of Radiation Physics, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
* Corresponding author: anders.tingberg{at}rfa.mas.lu.se
Purpose: The aim of the present study is to compare two different methods for evaluation of the quality of clinical X-ray images. Methods: Based on fifteen lumbar spine radiographs, two new sets of images were created. A hybrid image set was created by adding two distributions of artificial lesions to each original image. The image quality parameters spatial resolution and noise were manipulated and a total of 210 hybrid images were created. A set of 105 disease-free images was created by applying the same combinations of spatial resolution and noise to the original images. The hybrid images were evaluated with the free-response forced error experiment (FFE) and the normal images with visual grading analysis (VGA) by nine experienced radiologists. Results: In the VGA study, images with low noise were preferred over images with higher noise levels. The alteration of the MTF had a limited influence on the VGA score. For the FFE study, the visibility of the lesions was independent of the sharpness and the noise level. No correlation was found between the two image quality measures. Conclusions: FFE is a precise method for evaluation of image quality, but the results are only valid for the type of lesion used in the study, whereas VGA is a more general method for clinical image quality assessment. The results of the FFE study indicate that there might be a potential to lower the dose levels in lumbar spine radiography without losing important diagnostic information.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M Bath and L G Mansson Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 169 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Borjesson, M. Hakansson, M. Bath, S. Kheddache, S. Svensson, A. Tingberg, A. Grahn, M. Ruschin, B. Hemdal, S. Mattsson, et al. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bath, M. Hakansson, J. Hansson, and L. G. Mansson A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 230 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. G. Mansson, M. Bath, and S. Mattsson Priorities in optimisation of medical X-ray imaging--a contribution to the debate Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 298 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|