Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004 112(4):501-507; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch093
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heidenreich, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Paretzke, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heidenreich, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Paretzke, H. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 112, No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Interpretation by modelling of observations in radon radiation carcinogenesis

W. F. Heidenreich* and H. G. Paretzke

GSF—National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute for Radiation Protection, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany

* Corresponding author: heidenreich{at}gsf.de

Biophysical models for radon-related induction of lung cancer are developed with the aim of reducing the uncertainties in current risk estimates at low doses by a better understanding of the relevant mechanisms. These models can make use of the full dosimetric information when extracting information on, say, age-at-exposure, protraction or fractionation effects. It is found that irradiation by radon and its progeny does act on the initiating event of carcinogenesis (e.g. mutation), but its dominating effect is via promoting the division of already initiated cells. Data show that the concept of a unit of exposure giving, in an additive way, a unit of lung cancer risk is too limited, while relatively simple mechanistic assumptions described in this article do yield an adequate description of observations.

Exposures in epidemiological data sets are measured with error. For various error models it has been shown that likelihood-based techniques of correction work reliably; likewise for biologically based cancer models. When several parameters are allowed to be exposure dependent, for example, initiation and promotion, then their relative importance is influenced.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.