Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on September 22, 2004
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004 112(3):439-442; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch401
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/3/439    most recent
nch401v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adrovic, F.
Right arrow Articles by Glisic, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adrovic, F.
Right arrow Articles by Glisic, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 112, No. 3 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Technical Note

Measurements of environmental background radiation at location of coal-fired power plants

F. Adrovic1, M. Prokic2, M. M. Ninkovic2,* and R. Glisic3

1 Prishtina University, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Filipa Visnjica b. b., Kosovska Mitrovica
2 Institute of Nuclear Sciences—Vinca P. O. Box 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro
3 Belgrade University, Medical Advanced School, Cara Dusana 254, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro

* Corresponding author: markon{at}vin.bg.ac.yu

Environmental radiation monitoring in the vicinity of coal-fired power plants which are used primarily to determine the variability in measured background exposures are presented in this article; this is in order to estimate the contribution due to the plants' operation. Measurements have been done using a multi-element, high sensitive dosemeter system composed of three solid, properly filtered, sintered CaSO4:Dy thermoluminescent detectors, and one low-atomic number, MgB4O7:Dy,Na thermoluminiscencent detector produced at the Vinca Institute. The dosemeters were deployed quarterly 1 m above ground level at locations within 20 km of the power plants. Twenty urban and suburban measured stations were established. Measurements were carried out over one year period, from the beginning of the summer of 1995 to the end of the spring of 1996. The registered annual absorbed dose in air, from all of the 20 stations, vary from 0.91 to 1.46 mGy a–1. One of the highest values of the annual absorbed dose was measured at the station near to the plant, i.e. at the place the most exposed to the lighter fly ash from the plant stack, as it was expected. The annual absorbed dose registered at the measuring stations that were selected as a control because they were situated practically away from possible influence of the plants were from 0.91 to 0.98 mGy a–1. The above values of absorbed doses become very important, by concurrence of the circumstances, because they represent the zero background radiation level before the incidence of depleted uranium over former Yougoslav territory in the Kosovo region in the spring of 1999. These measured absorbed dose exposures have to be compared with corresponding absorbed dose rates from the natural sources, such as soil having an exposure of 18–93 nGy h–1 (average 35 nGy h–1) according to the UNSCEAR 2000 Report. This investigation has been primarily done in order to check the impact of coal-fired power plants on the background radiation level in its vicinity. According to the experimental results, influence was confirmed both qualitatively and quantitatively.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.