Skip Navigation


Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access originally published online on July 20, 2004
Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004 111(3):271-274; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch336
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
111/3/271    most recent
nch336v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stisova, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stisova, V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 111, No. 3 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Effective dose to patient during cardiac interventional procedures (Prague workplaces)

Viktorie Stisova*

Brehova 7, Prague 115 19, Czech Republic

* Corresponding author: stisova{at}hroch.ujf.cao.z

The aim of this study was to assess effective dose to a patient during cardiac procedures, such as coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transiluminal angioplasty (PTCA). Measurements were performed on 185 patients in four catheterisation laboratories in three hospitals in Prague using the dose area product (DAP) meter. Calculations of surface and effective dose were performed with Monte-Carlo-based program PCXMC. The mean DAP value per procedure determined in all workplaces ranged between 25.0 and 54.5 Gy cm2 for CA and 43.0–104.5 Gy cm2 for PTCA. In three cases, the surface dose exceeded the 2 Gy level for occurrence of transient erythema. The mean effective dose per procedure in all workplaces was determined to be in the range of 2.7–8.8 mSv for CA and 5.7–15.3 mSv for CA + PTCA combined. The results presented are comparable with those published by other authors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Mesbahi and N. Aslanabadi
A STUDY ON PATIENTS' RADIATION DOSES FROM INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC PROCEDURES IN TABRIZ, IRAN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 23, 2008; (2008) ncn310v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
E. Bogaert, K. Bacher, and H. Thierens
A large-scale multicentre study in Belgium of dose area product values and effective doses in interventional cardiology using contemporary X-ray equipment
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 1, 2008; 128(3): 312 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
A. J. Einstein, K. W. Moser, R. C. Thompson, M. D. Cerqueira, and M. J. Henzlova
Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging
Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1290 - 1305.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. M. Feuchtner, T. Schachner, J. Bonatti, G. J. Friedrich, P. Soegner, A. Klauser, and D. z. Nedden
Diagnostic Performance of 64-Slice Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 574 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. M. Feuchtner, S. Muller, J. Bonatti, T. Schachner, C. Velik-Salchner, O. Pachinger, and W. Dichtl
Sixty-Four Slice CT Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis Using Planimetry of the Aortic Valve Area
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 197 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
E. Bouvier, D. Logeart, J.-L. Sablayrolles, J. Feignoux, C. Scheuble, T. Touche, G. Thabut, and A. Cohen-Solal
Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2006; 27(24): 3033 - 3038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. M. Feuchtner, W. Dichtl, G. J. Friedrich, M. Frick, H. Alber, T. Schachner, J. Bonatti, A. Mallouhi, T. Frede, O. Pachinger, et al.
Multislice Computed Tomography for Detection of Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis and Quantification of Severity
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1410 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.