Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004 109(4):297-302; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch305
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dietze, G.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dietze, G.
Right arrow Articles by Alberts, W. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 109, No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Invited Paper

Why it is advisable to keep wR = 1 and Q = 1 for photons and electrons

G. Dietze1,* and W. G. Alberts2

1 Paracelsusstrasse 7, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
2 Billrothstrasse 4, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany

* Corresponding author: guenther.dietze{at}t-online.de

It has been well known for a long time that the biological effectiveness of photons and electrons depends on the mean linear energy transfer (LET) of the radiation considered, e.g. 60Co gamma rays are less effective than soft or hard X rays. Nevertheless, the protection and operational dose quantities applied in radiological protection include weighting factors, wR or Q, respectively, which were set to 1 for all low-LET radiations. Lack of precise information, simplicity and general practical considerations are the main arguments for this convention. However, a more detailed discussion on the practical aspects supporting this procedure is missing. The paper discusses in more detail some of these aspects regarding internal and external exposure situations, which may support the idea of continuing to use wR = 1 for photons and electrons and, correspondingly, using Q(L) = 1 for L < 10 keV µm–1.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.