Skip Navigation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2004 109(4):291-295; doi:10.1093/rpd/nch304
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harder, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dietze, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harder, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dietze, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 109, No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Invited Paper

Spectra of scattered photons in large absorbers and their importance for the values of radiation weighting factor wR

D. Harder1,*, N. Petoussi-Henß2, D. Regulla2, M. Zankl2 and G. Dietze3

1 Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Göttingen, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany
2 GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
3 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany

* Corresponding author: d.b.harder{at}gmx.de

In its review of the present values of radiation weighting factor wR and of possible revisions of this factor, the German Radiation Protection Commission has recommended to maintain the approach of ICRP 60 to base the selection of the wR value for a given radiation (e.g. fission neutrons) on observed values of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of this radiation ‘regardless of whether the reference radiation is X rays or gamma rays’. The physical background of the German recommendation is the buildup of a strong field of energy-degraded Compton scattered photons in the human body if exposed to an external field of high-energy photons, so that the total radiation field inside the body is a mixture comprising low and high photon energies. Therefore, it is appropriate that the selection of the wR value of the given radiation is guided by RBE values averaged over X rays and gamma rays as the reference radiations. In support of this rationale, the present paper provides a sample of Monte Carlo calculated scattered photon spectra in large absorbers exposed to high-energy photons. Depth-dependent fractional dose contributions of the scattered photons are tabulated for incident energies from 1 to 10 MeV, and estimates of the influence of their degraded energies on the biological effectiveness of the incoming radiation are presented. Accordingly, we point out that it is appropriate to use, for the purposes of ‘risk projection’, RBE values averaged over X and gamma reference radiations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
E. Schmid, H. Roos, and H.-M. Kramer
The depth-dependence of the biological effectiveness of 60Co gamma rays in a large absorber determined by dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2008; 130(4): 442 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
C. Streffer
The ICRP 2007 recommendations
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, November 1, 2007; 127(1-4): 2 - 7.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
J. Chen, H. Roos, and A. M. Kellerer
Radiation quality of photons in small and large receptors--A microdosimetric analysis
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 1, 2006; 118(3): 238 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
D. Harder, N. Petoussi-Henss, D. Regulla, M. Zankl, and G. Dietze
Letter to the Editor
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(4): 453 - 454.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. M. Kellerer and H. Roos
Response to Letter to the Editor
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(4): 454 - 454.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
D. F. Regulla and H. Eder
Patient exposure in medical X-ray imaging in Europe
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 11 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. M. Kellerer and H. Roos
Are all photon radiations similar in large absorbers?--a comparison of electron spectra
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 28, 2005; 113(3): 245 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.