Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by O'Leary, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by O'Leary, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiation Protection Dosimetry 108:263-268 (2004)
Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 108 No. 3 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Technical Note

Increasing film-focus distance (ffd) reduces radiation dose for x-ray examinations

P. C. Brennan*, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary

UCD School of Diagnostic Imaging, Herbert Avenue, Dublin 4, Ireland

* Corresponding author: patrick.brennan{at}ucd.ie

Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) from the traditional 100 cm has been shown to be an effective method of reducing dose whilst maintaining image quality. In particular, previous work increasing the FFD from 100 to 130 cm for lumbar spine examinations demonstrated an effective dose reduction of 44%.

Objective. The current study continues on from this work by investigating the dose-reducing efficacy of this FFD change for pelvis X-ray examinations.

Materials and methods. Dose measurements at 100 and 130 cm using thermoluminescent dosemeters were undertaken using an anthropomorphic phantom and patients. Image quality was assessed using CEC anatomical criteria and psychophysical tests.

Results. The results showed that increasing the FFD results in a reduction in effective dose of 33%, with no change in image quality. The data provided in this and previous studies demonstrate the need for rapid implementation of this simple cost-effective procedure across imaging departments, leading to an important reduction in collective dose.

Conclusion. The CEC recommendation of using 115 cm FFD for a number of procedures, although useful compared with 100 cm, undervalues by a factor between 2 and 3 the potential of this dose-reducing tool.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P C Brennan and D O'leary
Source to image receptor distance.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 266 - 266.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J L Poletti and D Mclean
The effect of source to image-receptor distance on effective dose for some common X-ray projections
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2005; 78(933): 810 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
W. Huda, K. M. Ogden, P. C. Brennan, and D. O'Leary
Letter to the Editor
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 16, 2005; 113(4): 453 - 455.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.