Radiation Protection Dosimetry 102:229-248 (2002)
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Uncertainty Analysis of the Weighted Equivalent Lung Dose per Unit Exposure to Radon Progeny in the Home
A parameter uncertainty analysis has been performed to derive the probability distribution of the weighted equivalent dose to lung for an adult (wlung Hlung) per unit exposure to radon progeny in the home. The analysis was performed using the ICRP Publication 66 human respiratory tract model (HRTM) with tissue weighting factor for the lung, wlung = 0.12 and the radiation weighting factor for alpha particles, wR = 20. It is assumed that the HRTM is a realistic representation of the physical and biological processes, and that the parameter values are uncertain. The parameter probability distributions used in the analysis were based on a combination of experimental results and expert judgement from several prominent European scientists. The assignment of the probability distributions describing the uncertainty in the values of the assigned fractions (ABB, Abb, AAI) of the tissue weighting factor proved difficult in practice due to lack of quantitative data. Because of this several distributions were considered. The results of the analysis give a mean value of wlung Hlung per unit exposure to radon progeny in the home of 15 mSv per working level month (WLM) for a population. For a given radon gas concentration, the mean value of wlung Hlung per unit exposure is 13 mSv per 200 Bq.m-3.y of 222Rn. Parameters characterising the distributions of wlung Hlung per unit exposure are given. If the ICRP weighting factors are fixed at their default values (ABB, Abb, AAI = 0.333, 0.333, 0.333; wlung = 0.12; and wr = 20) then on the basis of this uncertainty analysis it is extremely unlikely (P " 0.0007) that a value of Hw/Pp for exposure in the home is as low as 4 mSv per WLM, the value determined with the epidemiological approach. Even when the uncertainties in the ABB, Abb, AAI values are included then this probability is predicted to be between 0.01 to 0.08 depending upon the distribution assumed for describing the uncertainties in the ABB, Abb, AAI values. Thus, it is concluded that the uncertainties in the HRTM parameters considered in this study cannot totally account for the discrepancy between the dosimetric and epidemiological approaches.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. F. Baias, W. Hofmann, R. Winkler-Heil, C. Cosma, and O. G. Duliu LUNG DOSIMETRY FOR INHALED RADON PROGENY IN SMOKERS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 18, 2009; (2009) ncp183v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Puncher and A. Birchall ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY ON INTERNAL DOSE ASSESSMENTS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, November 10, 2007; (2007) ncm361v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Rahman, T. Iida, H. Yamazawa, S. Yokoyama, J. Moriizumi, F. Saito, and T. Ito THE STUDY OF ACTIVITY MEDIAN AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER USING IMAGING PLATE TECHNIQUE FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVE DOSE FROM RADON AND ITS DECAY PRODUCTS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 26, 2007; (2007) ncm221v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mohamed Influence of radioactive aerosol and biological parameters of inhaled radon progeny on human lung dose Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 18, 2005; 113(1): 115 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Stather Dosimetric and epidemiological approaches to assessing radon doses--can the differences be reconciled? Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 15, 2004; 112(4): 487 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Hofmann, H. Fakir, I. Aubineau-Laniece, and P. Pihet Interaction of alpha particles at the cellular level--implications for the radiation weighting factor Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 15, 2004; 112(4): 493 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nikezic and N. Stevanovic Influence of variability of 214Pb recoil factor on lung dose Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2004; 109(3): 197 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
